Profile of Environmental Worldview in 10th-Grade Students of State Senior High School 1 Turen of Malang Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v23i3.53759Keywords:
Environmental Worldview, New Ecological Paradigm (NEP)Abstract
Environmental worldview is a human paradigm towards the environment that describes how humans view and behave towards the environment. The research is to determine and analyze the environmental worldview of students at State Senior High School 1 Turen. This research was designed using a survey method involving 10th-grade students of State Senior High School 1 Turen, Malang Regency, using the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) instrument. NEP is a concept in environmental sociology that describes a new perspective on the relationship between humans and nature. It has demonstrated validity (r count > r table = 0.219) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.60). Size number is 80 students. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation, t-tests, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), with descriptive analysis following. The results show that most 10th-grade students at state senior high school 1 Turen have relatively low NEP scores, with an average score of 36.26, the lowest score of 27.00, and the highest score of 46.00. Demographic data also did not show significant differences, such as differences in class, gender, age, and blood type. The cause of the low environmental worldview among students is claimed to be the lack of learning that incorporates environmental worldview indicators at state senior high school 1 Turen.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (4th ed.). Rineka Cipta.
Boeve-de Pauw, J., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Adolescents’ environmental worldview and personality: An explorative study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.003
Covey, S. (2008). The Eight (8th) Habit. Free Pass.
Dasgupta, S. (2022). Global employment trends for youth 2022. https://doi.org/10.54394/QSMU1809
Dunlap, R. E., Van, K. D., Primen, L., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279892834_Measuring_Endorsement_of_the_New_Ecological_Paradigm_A_Revised_NEP_Scale
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm.” Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
Ewald, D. R., & Sumner, S. C. J. (2016). Blood type biochemistry and human disease. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, 8(6), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1355
Gifford, R. H., Dorman, M. F., Skarzynski, H., Lorens, A., Polak, M., Driscoll, C. L. W., Roland, P., & Buchman, C. A. (2013). Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear and Hearing, 34(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827e8163
Gillaspy, R. (2015). Environmental worldviews: Western and deep ecology.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question In Feminism And The Privilege Of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Harraway, J., Broughton-Ansin, F., Deaker, L., Jowett, T., & Shephard, K. (2012). Exploring the use of the revised New Ecological Paradigm scale (NEP) to monitor the development of students ecological worldviews. Journal of Environmental Education, 43(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.634450
Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piagets Theory of Cognitive Development. Educational Psychology Interactive, 3(2), 1–5.
Khan, A., Khan, M. N., & Siddiqui, T. Z. (2013). Gauging attitudes towards the environment through NEP: a case study from India) “Gauging attitudes towards the environment through NEP: a case study from India” Gauging attitudes towards the environment through NEP 43. In Int. J. Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation (Vol. 2, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSEI.2013.052760
Lee, K. (2010). The green purchase behavior of hong kong young consumers: The role of peer influence, local environmental involvement, and concrete environmental knowledge. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.524575
Ling, S., Landon, A., Tarrant, M., & Rubin, D. (2020). Sustainability education and environmental worldviews: Shifting a paradigm. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198258
Mccombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). A Progress Report On Agenda-Setting Research.
Miller, G. Tyler., & Spoolman, Scott. (2010). Environmental science. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
Narkhede, P. A. (2015). An empirical study on Blood Types and Personality. PRATIBHA: International Journal Of Science, Spirituality, Business And Technology (IJSSBT), 3(2), 32–36.
Noblet, C. L., Lindenfeld, L. A., & Anderson, M. W. (2013). Environmental worldviews: A point of common contact, or barrier? Sustainability (Switzerland), 5(11), 4825–4842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5114825
Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
Pleasants, K., & Gough, N. (2021). Worldviews, environments and education. Outdoor environmental education in higher education. International Perspectives, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75980-3_33
Putrawan, I. M. (2015). Measuring new environmental paradigm based on students’ knowledge about ecosystem and locus of control. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1336a
Rideout, B. E. (2013). The liberal arts and environmental awareness: Exploring endorsement of an environmental worldview in college students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.203a
Rogers, M., & Glendon, A. I. (2003). Blood type and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(7), 1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00101-0
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The Structure Of Environmental Concern: Concern For Self, Other People, And The Biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
Sookram, R., & Augustine, S. T. (2013). Environmental Attitudes and Environmental Stewardship: Implications for Sustainability. In The Journal of Values-Based Leadership (Vol. 6, Issue 2). https://scholar.valpo.edu/jvbl/vol6/iss2/5
Srbinovski, M. (2016). Gender differences in environmentalism: A case study of Macedonian students. Inovacije u Nastavi, 29(4), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1604101s
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
Sueb, S. (2015). Analisis Environmental Worldview Mahasiswa Biologi Fmipa Universitas Negeri Malang. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284174629
Syamsussabri, M., Suhadi, & Sueb. (2019). The Effect of Environmental Pollution Module on Environmental Worldview in Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012076
Taskin, O. (2009). The environmental attitudes of Turkish senior high school students in the context of postmaterialism and the new environmental paradigm. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701691689
Wibowo, N. A., Sumarmi, S., Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Kodama, Y. (2023). Students’ Environmental Care Attitude: A Study at Adiwiyata Public High School Based on the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP). Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118651
Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P.-P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism. In Journal of Social Issues (Vol. 56, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Titis Irodatur Rahman, Sueb Sueb, Vivi Novianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
